
IMF allocates $1.4 trillion to cyclical deals among AI companies
Major tech giants are financing their own clients to purchase their services. The IMF has allocated $1.4 trillion to such cyclical deals.

Major tech giants are financing their own clients to purchase their services. The IMF has allocated $1.4 trillion to such cyclical deals.

The Cabinet of Ministers approved a bill on updating the strategy, which provides for the restoration of war-damaged territories and the integration of EU requirements.

The Kyiv Commercial Court will hear a lawsuit on 16 November seeking to invalidate an investment agreement for the Main Astronomical Observatory site. The investor is LLC "Freds Resorts", whose shares are held by Vladislava Molchanova's sons.

Ukrainian President explained why a new head of the Office of the Prosecutor General has not yet been appointed and responded to accusations made against him by the former head of the department.

Desnyansky District Court is hearing the prosecution's case against Vasyl Bilohura. He is accused of inflating construction material costs during the reconstruction of a gymnasium funded by Swiss grants.

Analytics show that 1,399 documents submitted by 1,012 individuals working for the SBU are hidden from public access. The record is for 2023.

The new Deputy Minister of Digital Transformation, Valeriia Koval, holds a degree in political science and has extensive experience in the digitalisation sector.

Anna Prokop described how two men and a woman surrounded a young Ukrainian in a Żabka store, insulting him and threatening to return after his shift.

An analysis of the "Casino Secrets" case materials regarding the so-called "Favika" revealed the existence of a separate project called Favorit United, implemented through the lope.bet platform. Unlike other resources associated with Oleg Matyukha, this website remains active. The homepage explicitly states that the casino belongs to the company Favorit United. In professional registries, the Curaçao licence (number OGL/2024/300/0596) is also registered to the legal entity Favorit United N.V.
The domain name lope.bet was registered back in 2022. However, the project only received an official licence from Curaçao in May 2023. The website interface is available in two languages: English and Hindi. This choice of languages is logically explained by the company's strategy: India is identified as the main target market. The geography covered in partner offers includes India and Bangladesh, and the minimum deposit amount is approximately $4.
According to the business plan, the estimated gross gaming revenue (GGR) in the first year of operation was to be €4.5m. By the third year of the plan, this indicator was expected to grow to €15m. It is worth noting that GGR is not net profit, but the difference between the amounts of bets and payouts to players, without accounting for salaries, platform costs, and taxes. Converted to hryvnia (at an exchange rate of approximately 48 UAH/EUR), this corresponds to an estimated 215–220m UAH at the start and approximately 720m UAH in the third year.
Thus, on paper, India was to become not just a showcase, but a separate million-dollar financial stream that would complement the Ukrainian Favbet.
However, lope.bet currently functions only as a landing page. There are no options for placing bets or withdrawing funds. The planning remains only in PDF files. Despite the presence of a licence and the Favorit United brand on the homepage, the expected volumes of financial flows from the Indian market have not been realised.
A separate aspect that raises questions is information about the transfer of 17,000 shares of the company Favorit United N.V. to a person surnamed Vedran Frelih. The price per share was $1, with the total value of the deal being $17,000. Formally, the international asset was valued at an amount equivalent to the value of the shares. Meanwhile, the business plan for the same direction assumed obtaining tens of millions of euros in gross revenue. This creates a dissonance: either the shares were sold at nominal price despite the real value of the business, or the financial indicators do not correspond to the terms of the contract.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!