The boy, who previously complained about being beaten by people in uniform, is now accused of assaulting a law enforcement officer. His father claims the child was at school at the specified time.
Toma Bernatska shared how her 90-year-old relative participates in the All-Ukrainian Dictation annually, revealing only one inaccuracy in this year's work.
The capital's mayor called the president's statements manipulations, reminded that heating started on 16 October, and urged an end to the search for scapegoats.
Ukrenergo announced the introduction of round-the-clock electricity consumption restrictions in several regions due to the aftermath of Russian attacks.
The Public Integrity Council confirmed that Roman Titivalov failed to meet ethical standards due to a drunk driving accident, despite the criminal case being closed.
Vitaliy Mohyla, head of the MVS Service Centre in Horishni Plavni, declared the purchase of a Lexus RX 350 for UAH 500,000 in July 2026. In the same month, he sold other movable property for UAH 400,000.
Investigation into tax minimisation scheme by food retail network continues in Chernivtsi. Cash in hryvnia and US dollars seized during office search.
Footage published online illustrates the near-total evacuation of the frontline city of Sloviansk in Donetsk region, located in close proximity to the zone of active combat operations.
A prosecutor from the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) informed that the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) sent a letter to the Higher Anti-Corruption Court (VACS). The document mentions a threat of a terrorist act that may occur during the hearing in the criminal proceedings concerning General Duka.
According to the information, the case review is planned to be conducted without the presence of mass media representatives.
In connection with the exclusion of journalists from the hearing, the SAPO prosecutor requested the recusal of Judge Voronko. He also noted that the defence is deliberately dragging out the process. According to the prosecutor, such actions aim to prevent the court from selecting a preventive measure within the established 72-hour deadline.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first!